Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  You give me that after you had said that I pensively considered your work? You can lead a thinker to a pigpen but you can't make him stink, until further notice.
I'm not arguing that gravity isn't a repelling force. I had said that it could be both an attractive and repelling force according to atomic alignment, and I hope after reading the link you posted in the other thread regarding there being no such thing as gravity, that your mechanics aren't implying the same idea.
That link has to do with the "bombardment" of particles, and a shadow-lack thereof, which can be easily discredited when considering that more mass doesn't mean larger size; yours, I thought, had to do with spatial expansion, like a dark energy within all matter. |
__________________________________
You changed my mind about having pensively considered my work. Clearly you haven't. At least you refused to do so, early in our formerly civil dialogue. Your later quantum leap to the spinning motion of the earth and how it would be swallowed up by the sun revealed your 'prescient' intentions.
You didn't learn from Truly Yours that 'more mass means larger size.'
What does 'dark matter' have to do with anything but gravitonics, SuperString theory and smokey mirrors?
Argue with ST about the concentricities formed in the bombardmement of a Gold film.
The link I posted regarding there being no such thing as gravity is an example of how far the
'no motion', 'no space', 'no space-time', 'if you don't understand it mathematically then you don't understand it' elements have gone.
Yes. Gravity on or near major gravitational coordinate systems is a repelling, 4-D generated, inertial-mechanical acceleration. At greater distances (refer aquatic, terrestrial & atmospheric tides; etc.) the physical extension of 5 & 6 dimensional electromagnetism from 4-D matter accounts for action at a distance and is an impelling force.
"If you can't comprehensively explain it to your grandmother, then you don't understand it." - Einstein.
P.S. I wish to congratulate you on and thank you for your thread on T.O.N., it is needed as a comparative antithesis and very well done. I wish I'da thought of it.
Regards
- RP