[N0B0DY]

Well, let me just say you're right about one thing. I'm not interested in swallowing the consensus based soley on empirical and theoretical science without philosophically extending it to draw my own logical conclusions. You can't explain matter without antimatter because you can only observe sensorily with c as the yardstick, and c is far from accurate. True c is absolute, non-existent, and relative rates of propagation and energy transfers can only be the result of antimatter slowing light down to c.

I've pressed Lloyd and Dave and many other scientists to explain there exact positions regarding what is outside of the universe and/or what the universe is made of exactly.

The bottom line is any conceivable universal functioning doesn't work, I've looked deeper into it than anyone I've come across, and that's my safety net to safely say that nobody knows what he/she is talking about except Einstein who admitted that there is nothing left of the castle.

Sincerly, best of luck in your search for truth. Your out-of-the-box thinking is truly brilliant, if your own.