David, when you extend your math and ideas to discuss the entire universe, instead of the quantumized half you keep choosing to discuss, I'll listen to you, and yes it is I who said what you quote, and I still stand by it, yet we have neither the completed math nor language necessary, to describe the true fundamental mechanics, of the observed universe___yet. You seem to hold to the micro-black-hole theory of virtual particle and particle creation, and I hold to the macro-black-hole theory of finiteness creation, from the infinite singularity forming the finite singularity, and since I state the fundamental particles are already in existence, eternally, it makes much more logical sense. I'm well aware of the languages used to describe the incomplete models of the universe, I just don't choose to use these same incomplete languages, yet instead, am trying to develop an entirely new language and math, to describe the same phenomena.
These are two very opposite ended ideas, and your's holds to the principle that a macro-universe can be created from a micro-universe, which I state is the foolish mistake science has been making for most a hundred years. My model sensibly states it takes an initial macro-universe to produce any type of universe, as the large can never come from the small___The small must evolve from the large, even if it's the infinitesimally small/large infinity. You show me a math to describe the infinitesimally small/large infinity, and I'll start listening. So far, I haven't found such math...
David, there are many reasons your model can't work, but so far, you've been unwilling to discuss them, but I'll just state finiteness can not possibly produce infinity, and electrodynamics, which is scientifically known to be hot, by velocity necessity, can never possibly produce 0k cold thermodynamics, which would be two more impossible requirements of your model. You start explaining how fundamental substance electrodynamics produces infinity, and 0k cold, and you may have....? No, not even possible___Period...!!!
Lloyd
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing  Lloyd;
YES it is!
Who is it that made the statement: “If you cannot express it in numbers, you do not know what you are talking about”. Are you having trouble expressing your concept with numbers? So did Einstein; that's why he hired a mathematician.
My concept only attempts to explain current numbers in such a way that even a novice can follow and understand the fundamentals and thus know when they are being handed a load of crap. Wave mechanics are required to totally comprehend QM and the various field theories and how they describe fundamental matter and its behavior.
You cannot discuss concepts of TOE until you have a good grasp of the language needed to express it. |