[N0B0DY]

Hello again, Bob.

Your responses clarify alot, and your website clarifies even more so. The system seems to be time-progressive, although I know what you mean when you say the one system transcends the temporal subsystems, and it explains everything pretty clearly.

I can understand that few people are willing to venture into the unknown preferring to keep things empirical and theoretical, but the basis of my inquiry is more than not what is between the lines of the story you've put together, that's how I function. At another site there was one individual who reminds me of yourself, as he proposed a refinement of matter whereby natural phenomena are superimposed, so to speak.

You mention that the system is all-inclusive, and if I'm not mistaken you implied that all phenomena manifests through light which is supportive of my own ideas that all forms of matter are forms of light. I admit I look for minds on the same track, and when you further stated that electrons don't exist between orbitals, needless to say, it caught my attention. Mainly because I have proposed that light doesn't exist in and of itself until divided, similar to your proclamation that without differentiation no phenomena could exist. Although not entirely accurate, I often use analogies of white canvass containing all pictures, or an analog system containing all digital information.

My contention regarding the orbitals is soley due to the spectral lines being separated by a void instead of a spectrum, to keep "things" whole or true to system one, where the electron clouds are discrete quanta of energy but are phases of the transitional spectrum. If we consider that photons at the required energy level to produce electrons/positrons, produce them perpendicular to the collision, it evidently creates detectible clouds within the spectrum. Based on your depiction of system one, I would propose that the proton is the result of the process above, consisting of approx. 918 electrons and positrons continually attracting each other, annihilating into photons, and recreated at detectable frequencies. I further propose that linear time is absolute, but dilated at Planck by the collisions of photons creating the gravitational mass of electrons and positrons. We know that pinpointing particles, the same particles, is impossible to do, and within the energy clouds observed particles can be related to measurements between annihilation events which emit photons and drop electron orbitals squaring energy across the frames. Essentially there is no point where particles manifest, because the events are instantaneous, and observations are realtive to frequencies which explains why some "particles" are absorbed and others pass through atoms.

I'm certainly not one to argue with non-existence, as a whole in and of itself, but relative to the frames in question I think we could say that they are similar to electron clouds at undetectable frequencies. Eventhough we don't observe the back of something while observing the front, it must exist for the front to exist; and eventhough some frequencies are undetectable, their cumulation is required for detectable frequencies to exist.