| Re: Does everything move?
Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  The qualification would be moot I think, if the universe is void of corporeality. The infinite number of sources, being non-dimensional, would render the universe as a single non-dimensional point which is the same as no point at all.
Though I was exaggerating, when I said the sources would overlap. If my position is that there is no motion, there can be no such thing as a literal source of it. | ___________________________
Dear Nobody:
A singular source of motion? I don't see any such phenomenon either, Nobody. I think we're corroborate on that note. On the other hand, with the center being everywhere as it is observed to be, there are sources in each apparently expanding concentricity we call a sub atomic particle, no?
RSVP
- RP
__________________
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
|