Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  "existence is NOT based on purely sensory observations but on the very make of Humankind its self."
I can ask how else can you deduce the above, other than by sensory observations? You refer to energy and matter as being real, only because you have sensed their effects. If you didn't sense them, there would be no way to claim they existed.
The absolute is the opposite of relative - standard dictionary definition - and the proposition is that the absolute universe is the same everywhere, which is the same state as being the same nowhere. Without relative reference points, things don't exist, and the absolute state of non-existence has two abstract reference points: primarily, expansive and contractive; a forward extension and simultaneous backward retraction. Simply explained as 1-1=0. The "0" is the non-existent state of the universe, but holds the necessarily-abstract perspectives of "1" and "-1" and all the fractions in between, which are the basis for relativity and evolution to function. |
I've been reading some of my old notes I found recently and I think pretty much the same thing. My own idea is that if we "humans" observe the universe (whatever that is) we will see 3 distinct potentials within its formation but only relative to our own "existence" so to speak.