[N0B0DY]

I'm fairly sure the idea is one of an eternally existing perfection, where imperfect replication is the temporal by-product of its eternal existence. Sort of like recycling waste to maintain functioning, or filling up a gas tank. This existence can be ordered and somewhat complex, but used for an entirely different purpose than what we use it for.

In other words, on the one hand we already have the most-complex, perfect existence; on the other, the inverse applies because we are starting from scratch.

"And never ever in the evolution of the Universe did any circumstance need the existance of God. Hence probably God can never be proven logically...."

The above doesn't really make sense if god is interpreted to be the universe, though. That would be like saying, never ever in the evolution of the Universe did any circumstance need the existance of the Universe.