[humanbydefault]

The first thing we bumped into -as we try to acknowlege the physical basis behind the controversial "uncertanty" and "probabilistic" outcome of any experimental quantum mechanical observation- is no doubts about it TIME.

The fundaments of the "wave function" lies in trying to get closer to the location of a "particle" that -at the same time- owns an initial momentum across a medium. I named those "changing status" FRAMES and divided them in 4 (four) parts of one cycle corresponding to one wavelength of a photon [light].

Each FRAME describes a particular instant inside the cycle and corresponds to the top points of 3 dimensional axes (x,y, and z).

My theory -"Bonding Harmonics"- states that chemical bonds are always found in 3D space between the actual axes and those top-points mentioned above are what's known as "anti-bonding areas".

As explained in my theory, the magnetic field is the collection of those "anti-bonding points" along 3D space, where no chemical bond is possible. It is at those coordinates where magnetism becomes a physical reality. As I said in my theory both magnetic poles are "divided in time" since they can't physically exist at the same time. The origin of magnetic poles is consequent with the elapsing of a "Standing Wave" process around the atomic orbit -just as explained inside the theory.

Chemical bonds are separated in TIME [undetectable-by-human-capabilities fractions of a FRAME] from what we observ as "magnetic fields" around atoms and molecules. The measured 'electron' along the chemical bond is the result of a similar process of "Standing Waves" ,but this time, between two or more atoms during chemical bonding.

My point is that there are 2 (two) different physical phenomena separated in fractions of a "Time-frame" [we can't possibly detect using any imaginable experimental apparatus] causing at the same time the "UNCERTANTY" generated with the introduction of Quantum Mechanics and its accepted misundestood and confusing conclusions.

HBD