Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing  Lloyd;
The absolute fundamentals are actually quite simple; it’s natures smoke and mirrors that make them appear tricky. Maybe I should say it’s the terms we give to the measurements that make it appear tricky. Once you know the trick, the magic disappears. You need to stop using the magic as an explanation of natural phenomena. You are still giving explanations using science terminology you only think you understand. |
We see the universe linguistically different, David. And it is mainly linguistics that separates most of our science. I say the fundamental linguistics must be dealt with first, but you have never wanted too. I think you see absolute motion as velocity/speed, and I see it as quantity/light velocity everywhere, from low entropy/slow speed, to high entropy/high speed, to low entropy/low speed again, yet existing in its changing velocity states throughout the entire universe. If I'm not mistaken, you see it as a fixed amount of high velocity motion/energy, and I can not support such an unknowable conclusion. The entire macro-logical history of matter decay time/distances/velocities/mass does not support such correspondence science, which I know to be scientifically true, by the correspondence facts of micro-state physics, to macro-state physics comparisons. If you'd ever take the time to see there's much more to
matter density facts, than thus far you are willing to admit, you'd quite easily see it offers much to explain, and further prove, the micro-state facts, through the macro-state facts. It also successfully unites classical, quantum and relative physics models.
You seem to think electro-magnetism is a universal fundamental, and I certainly do not___Neither did Wheeler, as he continued to question the universal circuitry to his dying day. I continue to state that, the matter density model of finite universal decay physics, clearly shows the requirement of a real physical sized singularity/big bang or small bangs reality, to create the fundamental forces of motion, except kinetic energy, to begin any real visible universe. Without such a singularity, or set of singularities, there's only dark thermo-hydro-dynamic-kinetic matter/energy, before first light and em-rads. This is exactly and all the macro-model of the total universal evolution shows...
BTW, "Matter is everything in a void___Absolutely." Also, measurement can be most accurately grounded in a new gauge theory of universal decay, with its "set" being that of a variable speed of light over universal evolution___All the most accepted laws and math of standard and quantum physics applies. A variable c model allows proofs of all physics' anomalies, once and for all. The tick-tick-tick of the cesium clock, still has the most to offer to science proofs___Matter density controls the tick-velocity...
Lloyd
p.s.
I have all the proofs in my notes David, but they are still too scattered for me to put it all in a single post. In about two to three months time, I should have all my notes edited, and a statement of facts will then be available for posting. Sorry for only the partial story, but my mind can not possibly sort all the notes at this time, into more sensible posts. I do realize the proofs exist in my notes, as I've re-edited them about three times now, but can't quite remember the important points and laws, from some 500 pages of mixed notes. I experienced the same thing while editing my economic and philosophical ideas, until I had reduced the notes to bare essentials, that are more easily decipherable, so for now that's it...
