View Single Post
humanbydefault
2nd degree Black Belt

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 326
16 humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
Quote  
06-25-2007, 12:12 PM
Post Re: "frames Of Existence"

Q. Why is the understanding of 'TIME' and its relationship with what we know as '(physical) existence' so crucial?

A. Because its acknowledge would give us a clue about the mysteries involved in the understanding of 'mass.'

Allow me to illustrate this concept with the simplest of the everyday examples found in our daily lives: The clock.

Let's assume that we have one atom and we'd like to define a "set of references" for this single case.
According to my theory, the 'time' corresponding to 12 AM (when both arms of the clock are joining together at the top of the sphere) will correspond to the "North magnetic pole." No chemicial bond could occur at these spatial coordinates, just as I've explained before.
The 'time' corresponding with 6:30 (the point where both arms overlap each other and point downward) will be the exact instant where the "South magnetic pole" appears.

Now, what is happening at 3:15 and also at 8:45 ? The answer is the "flow of electrical charges" from one atom to the next across the chemical bond.
Those 'times' are also known as "Anti-bonding zones" of the atom.

If those 'times' can't be used to bond with other atoms then...when?
It depends on the number of harmonics existent in the "clock-sphere."
The interesting aspect of the whole things is that by the 'time' the clock finishes an entire cycle, it will also coincide with the 'time' a wavelength of light (photon) will take to complete its 'own cycle' ["c"].

Just as our originally chosen atom of my example has its own "set of time coordinates" with respect to its own, each atom participant in a molecule has its "own time setting" too and that is what makes a molecule so complex: the stability of any molecule depends on the achievement of global symmetry in time on the part of each constituents -individual atoms that ultimately form the given molecule-

The way we have classified the strength of the bonds between atoms inside a molecule > single, double and triple bonds< has everything to do with the 'time' or location of the harmonic involved in the actual chemical bonding and never with the so-called 'number of electrons' acting as glue between them.

The legitimacy of a chemical bond -explained in my theory in details- finds its 'roots' in the necessary correspondence between the "Bonding Harmonic" in charge of the link between 2 (two) atoms and the frequencies observed in the spectrography of the Hydrogen atom. As if the atom of Hydrogen (the familiar 'Proton') was the universal pattern from where all matter in the universe must be "tuned to."

The familiar colors found inside light (rainbow) come from the scattering of energy from those legitimate bonding between atoms of a molecule. But just the ones allowed the 'universal tuning fork' owns by Hydrogen alone.

The main idea [read picture] I tried to bring in the pages of my theory is that symmetry is universal from the smallest atoms to the largest galaxies in the universe. Also that the nature of 'TIME' is integrated to the main 4 (four) realities each atom could present at any given cycle. The 'temporal nature of a single molecule and its complexity with respect to their participant 'atomic times' makes impossible for us to ever be capable of experimentally demonstrate its "FRAMES OF EXISTENCE" in real time.

However I believe that there should be a way to mathematically predict those dimensional projections of matter in 3 Dimensional space including all 4 (four) realities of matter.

I am convinced that science [physics in particular] can and will enjoy once again the priviliges of being an exact science as it used to be before the classical Einstein-Bohr controversy. My theory explains -even to the layman- the reasons both were right at certain point and also wrong with respect to other concepts.

To me, personally, Einstein was right in that a final theory must be capable of describing the physical reality with 100% exactitude. The point where I find him wrong is with respect to the single reality he thought it could be described. I stated that there are 4 (four) different "FRAMES OF EXISTENCE" or realities if you will and that only an understanding of TIME and MATTER as the result of energy interactions in fractions of that TIME wil take us there.

HBD

Last edited by dleviwing; 06-25-2007 at 03:07 PM. Reason: Corrected type-O's
Reply With Quote
humanbydefault is offlineReport Post
 
Alcohol Rehab | Alcohol Rehab | Cadillac | Online Loans | Mortgage Calculator