[humanbydefault]

quote:

"...the sole result of bonds formed between atom's harmonics [integral part of a "Standing Wave" resonance initiated in the very core of each 'bonding atom' and NOT AS THE RESULT OF NEGATIVELY CHARGED 'PARTICLES' WITH THE NAME OF "ELECTRONS"]..."

Anyone reading these words would probably exclaim: "How could this...humanbydefault guy... dares to confront the results of countless observations about the existence of actual "electrons" at specific points in space inside chemical bonds?

I'll answer that, but allow me to tell you a little historical controversial story about this same subject.
Did you know that at the begining of theoretical chemistry there was an important chemist who "joke" and ironically stated that the idea of "electrons" practically 'sitting there' between two atomic orbital as (and I'll literally quote it) "DRY GOODS" boxes inside a bond was catalogued as ridiculous. I think that it was an understatement from his part, personally.

My theory considers "those observed electrons" in those specific places the evidence of something else: THE ACTUAL ENERGY-CAPACITY OF THOSE "PUMPS" I MENTIONED DURING THE MUTUAL HARMONIC INTERACTION.

Molecules formed in 3D space will contain a number of "bonding envelopes" for each bonding harmonics along the cycle and if we suply the exact quantity of energy to those 'envelopes' they will brake the chemical bond between other atoms (as observed in electrolisis) but that does not mean that there were physical 'particles' there before we disturbed the symmetry.

"We created the same particles we claim them to "hang around" the exact moment we disturbed the "system" [original symmetry]."

HBD