| Re: The Mest Theory Of Everything -
06-29-2007, 10:20 AM
Dear Guatam,
The wholeness idea is fine. But how would you define the nature and relationships of different constituents of this universe?
To me, you have to go back to existing physical science to describe the fundamental elements of the universe. Then existing paradoxes resurface again.
Your idea does not offer anyting new, unless you develope your idea much further and offer a new understanding of the elements of the universe and their relationship.
Mohsen I like to contact people with same passion for theoritical physics.
I Also offered a model for TOE which I present it for discussion in my website. www.universaltheory.org |