View Single Post
Re: Inert & Heavy Mass (GR)
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Graybeard
7th degree Black Belt
Graybeard is a name known to allGraybeard is a name known to allGraybeard is a name known to all
 
Graybeard's Avatar
 
Status: Online
Posts: 1,179
Thanks Given: 433
Thanked 320x in 207 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 29
   
Re: Inert & Heavy Mass (GR) - 06-30-2007, 11:50 PM

Rascal .. This quote is from a thread posted on this forum on 2-Apr-2005. The thread was never replied to. It contains three website links.

Quote:
Originally Posted by d p fitzpatrick View Post
You asked for a Theory of Everything.

I just happened to have exactly what you want: Just click any of these links below.

Fitz's Theory of Everything
A short, concise version
Fitzpatrick's First Book

Enjoy these

DPFJr
This is an excerpt from the concise version:

Quote:
Why do we have this thing called inertia or inertial mass?

What is this thing called energy?
Go back to 1917 when people all believed in Einstein's
cosmological constant, which gives a steady repulsive force between all the stars, galaxies and super clusters.

Most people believed in a steady state universe way back then. All the universities now claim that this was a big blunder made by Einstein. But was it?

Saul Perlmutter says, "Einstein was right all the time." And now more scientists are swinging over and saying Perlmutter is correct and perhaps all these universities have been wrong now for the past 75 years.
See, if we have this acceleration that Perlmutter's group recently discovered---and others have added to Perlmutter's findings---then we are back 75 years again to a repulsive force, steady state universe and here's why.
cool bananas ... greg


'Blondie says I must hate all Brunettes. I'll try, but if I can't ... I'll love them both'
... graffiti on Tavern wall, Pompeii, circa AD 70.
  
Reply With Quote