Quote:
Originally Posted by MJA  Dear Bob, |
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJA Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle was only the tip of the measure problem. Your ideas on measure being seen as "quantized pulses" parallels his doubt. Although I admit I do not fully understand your ideas on a true constant of measure, I think your direction is right. I found this quote this morning and thought it related perfectly to your writting. If so, then east meets west and the goal of unification is one step closer to unity, reality, and truth. The human being may be no more real than is a cinematograph film. When the projected light is switched off all that remains is a blank screen. That which has been projected by light was a series of 'stills'. Such also is what is beng projected by 'life'. The more you consider the analogy the more perfect it seems to be: it could help us to understand. - Wei Wu Wei Perhaps the stills of light we see, rather than measures of uncertain differences, are nature's truth or certainty of equality. The truth that will set us free! Have an equal day, MJA |
Dear MJA,
Thank you for your interesting comments. It is strange that theories like the Big Bang and an extreme Darwinian view of evolution are promoted as gospel even though they contain many contradictions. Let me try to clarify a bit. There are measurable relationships that relate to this physical world that we are obliged to make some degree of sense of in order to cope in a practical manner during our brief sojourn here. Some of these have universal characteristics with reference to the physical world, such as the universal speed of light transmission and Planck’s constant. Although these universals are well established in physical terms this does not necessarily mean they have absolute significance to all possible realms of experience. It only means that while we are here they apply in a limited physical context. Note that I am not using the word measure here in the sense of values.
Space and time are derived concepts from this physical creation without reference to an absolute clock or a celestial yardstick. In current physical theories standards of measure are arbitrarily chosen from the macroscopic environment. In a continuous universe they can not be defined as universal properties implicit in the very nature of how the physical creation is projected at an atomic level. Units of physical measure can only be arbitrary.
In a discontinuous universe the transmission of light in a primary interval of time associated with one integrated space frame of the cosmic movie physically defines external space with respect to the internal spatial dimensions of a primary atom. Light issues from within atoms that are discontinuous. Light and matter occur together as a sequence of movie frames. The measure of external space thus relates to the inner space of a physical atom and this has universal significance in the physical universe. Because this ratio must be constant there can be no expansion of an assumed spacetime continuum distinct from mass and therefore no Big Bang.
Space and time are not a priori absolutes. Since light in transmission exhibits a continuous spectrum of frequencies over an electromagnetic rainbow, the primary interval of time for each space frame can be measured in relation to it. Max Planck found that light energy and its frequency have a fixed relationship to his universal constant of action “h”. This constant directly suggests a discontinuous universe. So both space and time have a fundamental datum of reference implicit in atomic structure. It takes a while for all this to sink in. It has been a century sinking in to the physics community but it must one day come to this conclusion.
The uncertainty principle simply follows as an obvious and necessary consequence. Since all relative particulate motion occurs as a series of quantum jumps in position between still frames, position and momentum can not be known simultaneously. The more you know one the less you can know the other.
The quote by Wei Wu Wei is very relevant. (I have lived in the East for many years.) Perhaps it is redundant to point out that our personal phenomenal experience is a property of mind spanning our evolutionary history and that we can learn to transcend this physical class room. I see it as learning a good degree of positive intuitive “balance” with the cosmic order and this concerns values. But the difference between balance and “equal” is just a matter of semantics.
Best regards,
Bob