[c. michael turner]

yes you can, that is my point. you and everyone else honestly may simply misunderstood a fundemental concept of matter decaying into the gravitational wave, graviton. for example a photon has mass unless it could be measures at rest. I believe the only way to measure it at rest is to take it to absolute zero. by takeing it to absoulte zero, no gravity wave is emitted and therefore although it exists it cant be measured as far as mass because mass is a direct measure of gravity wave emission. To me this is another piece of the puzzle that explains how time and space are actions of a process of matter decaying into the gravitational wave. I still don't see a logical alternative to the universe accelerating, how gravity works and time and space being relative to motion other than this, as forgien as it seems to you.

Originally Posted by quanta07

Please, stop pressing a bad concept. F=ma is elementary school physics
An equation used to describe the results of the influence of acceleration on mass......
You can not extend this simple equation in an attempt to define a 'force' in the universe.....
Then state this 'force' is constant, forcing mass to decrease.....

I am not countering anything, this is your 'concept', you have to show 'validity'
You concept is based purely in supposition.....and the logic is irrational....

These men were awarded the Nobel Prize for an 'assumption' that went along with Einstiens 'assumption'
No, its your theory, you prove it, logically....
Now you choose to think you have 'answered' something....
You have answered nothing, only attempts to restate what you claim as fact....

Maybe I have characterized you incorrectly.....
I am quite open to valid logical presentations, not 'negative' about other concepts, just BAD LOGIC and PURE SUPPOSITIONS....

Is Force = constant OR Mass=constant, I choose mass.....

Your sarcasm only diminishes your credability....
If you wish to choose character assasination, fine, it does not make anything you have stated previously, any more valid, only more suspect.

This forum used to be about 'gravity',

If you wish 'answers', then here are mine.....
http://www.toequest.com/library/article.php?id=015

This information has nothing to do with the beginning OR end.....
only the present conceptualization of our universe, and many misconceptions.....
gravity, light, quantization of mass, symmetry......and TIME itself...
In q7 journal, momentum, conservation of momentum, photoelectric effect....
All based on the mathematics of expansion.....