Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent  I may be willing to explain the results from Fizeau's experiment regarding the speed of light in moving water. But some things will have to be accepted without explaination, on a need to know basis.
Fizeau got an answer that he thought was close enough to confirm freznals formula and Einstein got an answer he thought was close enough to confirm his theory.
I can explain how it really works if someone else will do the math and compare it to the results of Fizeaus experiment. |
Sounds interesting, I'm especially interested in Einstein and the speed of light, my own view is that light is (as such) incorrectly viewed as an unchangingly singular constant observed without its opposite and neutral portentials.
Why will some things have to be accepted without explanation?
If you mean that you feel revealing certain details may be out of your comfort zone that's perfectly understandable but if you mean that you can't prove parts of your theory that may be another matter if you'll pardon the pun
What does this experiment, which it seems you can't complete yourself using math, have to do with your TOE?
Not that I can do complicated mathematics either but if you're relying on a mathematical result to explain your theory, or even possibly to "prove" it, I'd be very interested in hearing how it fits in. I am aware that you may not be able to tell me the whole story but if you could offer a kind of general indisputable proof it would make for an interesting debate or discovery if indeed your theory turns out to be accepted as the TOE.
Pro
