Originally Posted by N0B0DY  Absolute speed is the foundation for my theory, Lloyd, to explain the difference between light in an absolute vaccum and light in a non-absolute vacuum.[IMO, there is no absolute vacuum possible. Both universal stages, space without vacuum and space with vacuum, both must contain the fundamental substance, both states are truly made of, therefore; light speed is always governed by the matter densities of each state. True enough, light would at first travel faster in the stage one state, but still never at absolute velocity. Though this first matter state's density is extremely thin, it still exists, as the absolute fundamental substance of the entire universe.{this would be the fundamental matter, of the total or final, decayed state of finiteness, we're talking about.}] The former is the logical conclusion based on extending the laws of science, where absorption and emission of carrier particles is reduced to zero by reducing spacetime fabrications to zero.[You break the symmetry of the laws of physics, when you reduce the fabrications of either space, down to zero entity, except zero temperature. The univers must eternally contain its most fundamental substance, which is most likely a photonic substance.] We've been through it a few times, and you always wish to revert to mainstream.[Mainstream logic of logic, yes, of course. There is no valid logic of an abstract, just one's wild imagination. You can only reduce the fundamentals down to the absolute physical fundamentals, and no further. They may be small and thin densities, but they're still very much, eternally, there.]
The big bang that you advocate, as most others do, is based on a literal interpretation of religious text, and it is unnecessary to explain universal functioning.[The big-bang I'm using is not the big-bang you are referring to. It is the logical outcome of very empirically real celestial decay mechanics, from this very moment, using all the laws of physics and math, to prove, then its re-constitution as its only possible form___another massive singularity creating the vacuum and all the four forces of nature, from it thermal dynamics of, actually, a very thinned matter state gas of fundamental photonic substance, or whatever else you may propose as the absolute fundamental___real physical substance. But, it has to be a very real physical substance, to exist___period.] Does it really make sense to you that a universal state at thermal equilibrium contracts,[You're the only one saying it's at thermal equilibrium. I'd say it's at its greatest thermal dis-equilibrium, at fundamental state change formations, just as it is at the big-bang stage. IMO, we now live in the universe's greatest equilibrium state, which would be defined by the ability to support life.] especially when you are now disassociating quatum fluctuations from the process?[No, I'm not disassociating quantum fluctuations from the proces, just defining them very differently, than quantum mechanics does now. I'm saying first state space is linear quantum space motions only, which through first state evolution, change to linear/angular/spin quantum second state motions of matter/waves, to real solid matter.] Why wouldn't macroscopic laws apply to the microcosm, and why would macroscopic observations take precedence over their microscopic foundation?[Microcosmic and microcosmic laws both apply everywhere, that they exist, as the existing state of matter exists, but when the finite universe's spin and angular momentums decay, you certainly have a straight linear state space, and not the now recognized linear/angular/spin state. This is why at the decay, which would be the opposite end of the universal evolution model/fact/reality, the macroscopic observations must take precedence over the microscopic foundation, as the true foundation is the really the macroscopic matter and motions, as the prime state and mover___always.]
I liked your low-energy fusion explanations far more than your high-energy requirement, eventhough I disagreed with localizing the process. Just like the absolute speed[has no valid scientific meaning] above containing all relative speeds, absolute temperature[has no valid scientific meaning] contains all relative temperatures - the high-energy fusion is within low-energy fusion[true enough], like the zpe at both ends of the spectrum[also true enough] - and the bulk of gravitational energy is used to form neutrons.[No gravitational energy can be proved to exist in the stage one state of universal formation. In fact, the decay model easily mathematically, and logically shows this___If such gravitational energy decays, as we travel far into the future, beyond the spin to keep spinning light cone space, a new universe formation stage state would have no possibility of such quantum required motions___they would be beyond the celestial mechanics of finite spin and angular momentum, existing only as linear/slowly rotating decayed motions___The primal state of all motion.]
We can think of the universe as an infinitely large neutron, or consisting of an infinite number of neutrons (consisting of an infinite number of electrons/positrons/gravitons/photons), and just like the observed effects of decay when atomic numbers increase, the universe continually decays to produce a "time" of energy transfer at c in the non-absolute vacuum.[I'm not sure what you're saying here, but I see only the finite vacuum, created by the big-bang and spin, and a primary state space, beyond the finite decay, of no vacuum,{vacuum not existing, because it also decays, as a valid finite state space, into the true state space/void} containing the fundamental space/matter/motion.]
The point where electromagnetism overcomes the strong force is the point where electromagnetism unifies with the much weaker gravity at the macroscopic scale, to stabilize the bound state of hydrogen through the exchange of virtual particles that are nothing more than the residual effects of decay.[Agreed, but where does this take place, in the universe, if not in a singularity/black-hole?] You can call the lowest state absolute ground, just like we can call near zero absolute zero, but it's infinitely different. The absolute ground pertains to the absolute speed[And here I'd have to say, this is absolutely scientifically undefined.] and temperature of the universe - instantaneous interactions[Again, this is absolutely scientifically undefined.] - and the lowest bound state refers to the perturbations when the ground is infinitely divided.[And yet here, I would agree with you.] Sort of like a big earthquake, though abstract because the absolute can never change.[And here again, dis-agreement, because the absolute absolutely must be able to change, or nothing changes or moves___The frozen state problem?] |