View Single Post
humanbydefault
2nd degree Black Belt

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 326
16 humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
Quote  
07-07-2007, 12:00 PM
Post Re: "frames Of Existence"

I think I found a way to illustrated the process with a simple analogy:
Imagine that you have a pendulum in your hands. You make it move from left to right and it continues the swing from on side to the opposite one in the same time-period, just as a regular clock. If you assume that every time the pendulum "covers" both sides and returns to the middle position you have one "cycle" (as I called it) you could say that you have 4 sub-divisions in its momentum. Initially, it swings to the left (first), then it falls [by gravity] to the middle again (second), then to the right side (third) and finally returns to the middle position or initial (fourth). Those 4 (four) stages of the oscillating "resonance" of our hypothetical pendulum were actually completed at "c" (the speed of light). There was no violation of what Einstein proposed back in 1905...right?
The 'cycle' corresponds exactly with the time-lapse any photon of light takes to repeat its own propagation throughtout space. What I proposed in my theory is no far from that idea. The 'phased resonance' between those 4 points correspond to every single atom's orbital momentum. In other words, each 'frame of existence' is 'formed' when the orbit of a given atom bonds with the orbit of another atom in a chemical bonding (the fabric of matter).
As one of the harmonics present inside the atom's orbital momentum (a quantum mechanical expression of the assumed electron's rotation around the nucleus...) matches with another harmonic (physically speaking, tuned into the same pattern of vibration), a chemical bond is formed and atoms link together in a molecule.
When that 'bond'occurs in all 4 frames (3 dimensions) you have a physical process that elapses in many places around the atom in just one cycle.
To make things easier to visualize, instad of a left-right swinging of the pendulum, make it to rotate just as the arms of a clock. Let's imagine that in the hypothetical clock of ours, at 2 o'clock the forst bond was formed with a closer "clock" then at 4 o'clock the next bond takes place, and later on the same process repeats at 8 o'clock and at 10 o'clock. When the cycle is resumed at "c" as usual, our "clock" was capable of bonding with four other "clocks" swinging close to it also under the same period of time (corresponding to one wavelength of a photon of light).
What are we witnessing here? The origin of the fabric of matter as we know it in 3 dimensions occuring [relativistically speaking, of course] faster than light. Of course we know that never the speed of light was surpassed by any atom involved, what we saw was a physical process that was able to initiate and resume itself even before we could measure it, given the fact that the fastest we could "see" things depends on the time-period limited by an entire wavelength of light.
My point is that for that process (I've just described above) to occur and being able to preserve a perfect symmetry on both sides of the molecule in 3 dimensional space the structure of the orbit must be assumed to be compossed by harmonics of a resonant process and not by 'individual electrons' with particle identity and hypothetical electrical charge capabilities.
A single 'electron' allegedly spinning around the nucleus of one atom is incapable (under any circumstances) to preserve a 3 dimensional molecular symmetry bonding at the same time in 4 places of the molecule with different angles and different bonding strengths... If an 'electron' was capable of performing such a task, then we are in the presence of magic not science.

HUMANBYDEFAULT
Reply With Quote
humanbydefault is offlineReport Post
 
Personal Car Finance | Credit Cards | Myspace Layouts | Car Credit | Mortgages