View Single Post
Re: The Causal Identity of Gravity
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
RascalPuff
Aka the White Mongol
RascalPuff has a spectacular aura about
 
RascalPuff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,449
Thanks Given: 89
Thanked 81x in 77 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep Power: 21
   
Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: The Causal Identity of Gravity - 07-17-2007, 01:57 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Einstein View Post
RP



Your description appears to be completely opposite from what a logical visualization would show. Just remember apples aren't oranges. Just because you have one of each doesn't make them equal. So I am very curious as to how you could equate an expanding accelerating coordinate system to one that can logically be shown to be a contracting accelerating coordinate system.
_____________________________

Dear Einstein:
It seems you have departed from the specific issue at hand and gone on to mass-field doppler effect.
Are you applying excerpts from the posted work - http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie - here?

If you are alluding to a relative rest mass, that is the apple you've introduced. If you are alluding to a coordinate system in motion relative to a point of measurement, that is the orange you've introduced.

A test object on or near an expanding-accelerating coordinate system is subject to repelling forces of the 4-D space time continuum.
At greater distances, test objects are subject to the impelling force of electromagnetism.

This duality is expressed in the fact of microcosmic tidal effect occurring between subatomic particles - "No two particles ever come into contact. When they get too close, they move off". - Betrand Russell, the ABC of Relativity. That is to say, both repelling and impelling forces are engaged here. Comparable to the cosmological constant which accompanies the Classical Newtonian impelling force, but moves in the opposite direction.

Will you elaborate further on your contention, here?

Best regards,
- RP


(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
  
Reply With Quote