View Single Post
Re: The Causal Identity of Gravity
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Graybeard
7th degree Black Belt
Graybeard is a name known to allGraybeard is a name known to allGraybeard is a name known to all
 
Graybeard's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,174
Thanks Given: 425
Thanked 316x in 205 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 29
   
Re: The Causal Identity of Gravity - 07-17-2007, 05:59 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff View Post
Are you not familiar with the example of Einstein's elevator thought problem? I ask, because you seem to be familiar with the principle of equivalence at the same time that you question it's results.... When you accelerate in your car and are thrown back in the seat, you are experiencing the results of a repelling force. Your body's negative inertia is resisting acceleration against it. I don't understand your quandary at these facts...
_______________________

Regarding the neutron star proximity you speak of, since we aren't near any neutron stars it isn't presently tenable to speculate on how that would effect Point 2.
I believe I am familar with the equivalence principle. I am not questioning its results, just the interpretation of them. Inertial mass provides a resistive and opposite force to acceleration. You imply that inertial mass is 'generated' by acceleration and is not a measurement of matter.

1.. Do you believe inertial mass to be a function of matter?
2.. Do you accept that resistance to acceleration could be 'wading' thru the Higgs field?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff View Post
Action-at-a-distance (tidal effect as applied - for example - to aquatic, atmospheric and terrestrial tides) is caused by the generation and long distance projection of electricity and magnetism (electromagnetism: effecting an impelling force), originating from and generated by, given ('material') 4-D coordinate systems.
Your 'action-at-a-distance' effect you imply is caused by 'the generation and long distance projection of electricity and magnetism'. My reference to a Neutron Star which displays a gravitational field, would seem to contradict your statement. We may not be near a Neutron Star physically but since when has that stopped us from theorising or experimenting with the data?

A Neutron Star, presumably, has no charge yet still can create action at a distance.

3.. Can we be clear on one thing. Do you accept any part of Quantum Mechanical behaviour, or do you intend to maintain the continuity of matter as governed entirely by Newton-Einstein maths?

This link will take you on a journey to a Neutron Star. May the classical force field be with you. May you return safely in order to answer my three questions.

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/htmltest/rjn_bht.html



cool bananas ... greg


'Blondie says I must hate all Brunettes. I'll try, but if I can't ... I'll love them both'
... graffiti on Tavern wall, Pompeii, circa AD 70.
  
Reply With Quote