View Single Post
Re: to see is to believe or to believe is to see?
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
AntonioLao
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: to see is to believe or to believe is to see? - 07-29-2007, 03:51 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
there is only one dimension,which loops around itself,creating the "illusion" of many
Come to think of it, this is how color television works by the one scanner movements of the electron gun that phosphorized the color coatings.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Reply With Quote