View Single Post
RascalPuff
Aka the White Mongol

RascalPuff's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,455
Blog Entries: 100
21 RascalPuff has a spectacular aura about

Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1

Quote  
08-07-2007, 01:34 AM
Wink Re: The 'curvature of space-time' is the physical expansion of matter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graybeard View Post
No worries old friend. ... but please remember, that if i am taking you right, your contention is that all of space is expanding. This perforce includes the space within us, and therfore matter is expanding as well.

The more conventional contention is that macro-cosmically your hypothesis is true, with the difference that the expansion is being driven by dark-matter. Dark matter in the micro context is incapable of overcoming gravity and the Electro-magnetic force.. Therefore matter is not expanding with space.

There are also other problems with your hypothesis, as we have discussed in other threads.

some are:

Your hypothesis needs to explain the weak nuclear force.
the strong nuclear force
and the unsolved problem of

from the wiki
(Greg quotes a stement from the Wikepedia here, that didn't take in this transmission)



cool bananas ... we are in partial agreement. .. greg
_____________________________

Dear Greg:

My work does, categorically state (find) that matter (itself) is expanding (everwhere, omnidirectionally from it's center; micro & macro <'I suppose that when it comes right down to it, it's all waves and fields'. - Austin>).


The strong nuclear force is 4-D (omnidirectionally accelerating) gravity at it's 'earlier' moments... The A in the sequentially expanding < ABC pie-plate; with the microcosmically infinite 'intersection (A)', and the macrocosmically infinite open end, C; (with 'us', constantly in the 'eternal now', at its vertically bisected midsection: B)...


The (microcosmic) weak nuclear force is diminished only when compared to the strong nuclear force, though you are right in saying I have no explanation for it.

I'm not all that concerned with presenting my work as a Theory of Everything - that is unlikely to manifest as the work of one person, or even a small group of people. On the other hand, Robert (for example) is leading a growing number of people, and in this case there is indeed strength in numbers. Streaking (fully raimented) through the final frontier, going - in some cases - where no person has gone before, seeking out - and sharing - new worlds; etceteras...


There are any number of conditions, dynamics and phenomena that my work doesn't explain. (These challenges are as much those of my readers as they are mine - I respectfully invite expansion of my work, heehaw...)

I did not after all, invent gravity, whereas, until further notice, I did find it to fulfill the identity of the 4th dimension, and, in doing that, recognized electricity and magnetism (electromagnetism) as the 5th and 6th dimensions, respectively (an unprecedented identification of gravity, electricity and magnetism as the 4th, 5th and 6th dimensions). My work - since 1959 - also predicted an accelerating universe, that is one of several reasons that what you call an hypothesis, I call - and have proved - a theory.

Not by any means have I a Theory of Everything - but the contributions are fait accompli.
__________________________

Reprise:
There is already a mixed phalanx of variegated copy-cats and purloiners, arguing among themselves about who pilfered my work, first.

The internet is shaking with such highrolling buccaneers.

Perhaps the best known of whom is Mr. Mark McCutcheon - the first two chapters of his so called 'Final Theory'. Whether he pirated it or not: With any luck his work (1st 2 chapters) or any like it will take its place at the forefront of recognition: for my work. (Tempus impetus)

Whereas, as I have said before, I will gladly shake the hand of whomever may predate 1959 - the publicly distributed commencement of my (at that time essay-formatted and sold out) work as it was originally produced in Naples (buona fortuna), and on the southern French Riviera (Michael has already presented me with the oriiginal T-shirt for that occasion - literally the entire crew of my ship as well as several college professors witnessed all of this; not to mention countless, Spanish, Italian and French speaking physics buffs who bought it; many of whom sent it all over the world... Eventuating in The Portola Institute's Whole Earth Catalogue doing the same thing, internationally, in 1970).

My *unprecedented statement recently received one of its highest compliments when the venerable Lloyd Gillespie - of this forum - proclaimed that it's 'obvious' that *gravity is the 4th dimension... (I couldn't agree with him more...).
_____________________________

Closing for the moment with the sentiment that I've tried not to let fame or success spoil me, I remain -abundantly ridiculed, violently opposed, and occasionally congratulated - Truly Yours...
- RP
__________________
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Reply With Quote
RascalPuff is offlineReport Post
 
Credit Card | Loans | Pacotes Porto Seguro | Loans | Adverse Credit Remortgage