[N0B0DY]

We're both free to agree to disagree, north, but it should be based on solid premises.

Being aware or unaware of Einstein and Darwin is not a factor in the relative functioning of abstract phenomena. They both only realized to lesser or greater extent that the observable universe is based on relativity and change over time and based their theories on it. Abstract change is eternal, providing their are observers to observe it.

The reference points are not made of anything because the universe in its entirety can't be made of anything - "everything" is made of space, and space doesn't exist because there are no spaces possible existing between other space. Its like, but not accurately, one solid space that I equate to non-existence which is broken only by the illusory time it takes to process information.

The distant galaxies are inside your head, but you don't realize this because you absorb and process only a certain amount of photons over time. If you were to absorb and had the capability to process the entire spectrum, you wouldn't see/sense the galaxies because you would be the galaxies - they wouldn't exist at all. The abstract reference points, through which "photons" are absorbed and emitted, are not really anywhere because they are made of spatial motion which can't really exist - re: my premise above. So the photons are abstractly created, based on the infinite number of possible velocities relative to absolute speed/no speed, according to the infinite number of possible wavelengths and amplitudes.