[Fredrick]

A good reply, again, Nobody. Especially since it does make our separation of positions more clear.

It is always difficult to find the simplest framework and make it work for what we are trying to say. Yet it is becoming more and more obvious to me that you are using an overall two-prong approach, while mine is three-pronged.

Where I see you use the 1 and the 0 as the framework, and using conclusions from this approach, my framework on that same level as yours has three parts: A, 1/A and 0.

A: can be seen as the overall state, for which we agree that it does not exist as an absolute state (except in the abstract: universe, god, all).
0: can be seen as the phenomenon of nothing
1/A can be seen as the ego-level. Anything or anyone that can refer to itself as 'self' is covered under this 1/A. In this version, I am the 1 (and I do not need to translate this to include other people for whom the same is true, because each person reading it will read for themselves the basic truth: I am the 1).

Delivering an overall vision with a framework that does not give this aspect of 1/A an equally most important and fundamental position as 1 and 0, is appointing the wrong framework as the overall framework — it cannot be done. This is where our deliveries are separate deliveries. The ego is part and parcel of the highest level. It does not mean the ego is only of the highest level (unfortunately not), for when I write that I am the 1, I must immediately state that being the 1 does not mean that I am all-powerfull; I am just a tiny self, but I cannot be taken out of the equation. As such, I am both god-like and quite insignificant at the same time.

The consequence of this framework is that A does not exist without 1/A, and since I am at least to some degree disconnected of the A, the A is also not of an absolute nature (except in the abstract). However, the 1/A contains and displays the absolute nature. In our reality, we find multiple versions of an absolute nature.

In my view, the A as an absolute position can only refer to the original state that once existed (prior to the BB). And since 1/A is the currently existing delivery of this A, I must conclude that (even the original) A is of a far lesser magnitude than the Christian, Muslim, and Jewish cultures want to make us believe.

Within our universe, we encounter an environment of gigantic proportions — but only from our own perspective. That does not mean at all that the original state was anything gigantic. The potential of a gigantic oak tree is captured in a tiny seed. The seed contains the "god of this tree" already, is part and parcel throughout the life of the tree. And we can say that even when the seed does not come to become a full grown tree, the seed carries this absolute nature. This nature finds its appropriate position both at the specific level and at the overall level, and nothing in our universe can change that.