| Re: T.o.N. (Theory of Nothing) Nothing can change that except the changeless state of the universe, which is what I propose when we consider there are no spaces between particles.
Your proposition implies there are spaces of nothing separating multiple instances of absolute entities; and mine implies there are no spaces, nor are there particles existing relative to space and other particles. "The consequence of this framework is that A does not exist without 1/A, and since I am at least to some degree disconnected of the A, the A is also not of an absolute nature (except in the abstract)."
The above requires an explanation of how a literal 1 divided by an abstract 1 equals 2 separate states. That is like saying 1/0=2. "In my view, the A as an absolute position can only refer to the original state that once existed (prior to the BB)."
If the above were worded in such a way to refer to the non-existent state that can never exist, I would agree. The big bang, imo, is based on logical fallacies established through theological interpretations and furthered by misleading observations. Non existence can't exist at any time, especially if the implications don't allow for the existence of space and time.
Regarding the seed of life, growth, and the "I" existing separate to the absolute universe, there are many scams promoted by "gurus" that aim to merge souls with their true self based on ancient teachings. The idea being to singularize the self to the exclusion of eveything else, and they charge alot of money to teach you what is already known. This may seem irrelevant, but learning a method from others to gain some secret knowledge is the crux of what is trying to be delivered here.
The physical and spiritual kingdoms promoted for millennia are one and the same, based on unifying heaven (the head) and earth (the body) through methodologies and false religions. The goal is alignment and accord of the events of the heavens and earth, the head and the body; ironically by letting go completely of the self, the head and body naturally align, and the transformation of this alone would create heaven on earth.
It seems that people want to know all about the heavens, and to manifest their destinies on earth, instead of just letting the heavens do what it does (and doesn't do). |