Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat  And I think it is a great idea for a post Michael, but I keep losing it, and only found it again after your post. But listen up RP and Michael, and any other members who could locate this post. A little reseach yielded this: " The Copenhagen Interprtation (CI) described the quantum world with the principle of complementarity which consist of three parts. 1. A "whole" must consist of two opposite parts. 2. These two opposite parts must be mutually exclusive. 3. These two opposite parts are complementary to each other. (http://www.fortunecity.com/business/...3/Constant.htm) Does that describe an image we know.(yin/yang). Parallel universes here we come. Best to all, Pat P.S. Can we get a better site for this RP or is it too speculative |
____________________
Dear Prof:
Thank you very much for the additional contributions to our ongoing thread.
I really do think you're on to some real possibilities and contributions. Your insight as to what we're talking about - and its contingencies - is impressive. Inspirationally so.
Indeed. The afore issued two meshed gears moving in opposite directions seem to be the other side of the same coin.
I don't undestand the import of your *Post Script:
Please tell me what you mean by *'getting a better site.'
What kind of 'better site' did you have in mind? Where?
(No. I do not think that what/how we're dealing with is too speculative.
Avante garde is probly a more appropriate term. Note how the YinYang Tao Symbol is open to interpretation, as to whether the two images in the icon are in mutual or opposing directions. In either case they are understood to be symbiotically balanced.)
Best regards,
- RP