Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick  In trying to tie up the many,the one slips out through the door unnoticed?This is the constant problem that science fails miserably to grasp,or even see.
If we say there is just energy,that's all,universal energy is thing,there are no(things) energies,just(thing) energy.
We then have the theory of thing,which will be found to be so much more simple
that chasing all these fictitious particles with exotic names that mean nil,and keep producing themselves when they are predicted!All this mental gymnastics can be relaxed
leave the manic bi-polar search for things,and focus on the one Thing-energy!
regards michael. |
Michael, you have again come to that 'thing'. I have already told you why it is 'everything'. Please read it again and you will get answer in it. OK I tell you particularly the answer of this question. We want to know the reality and those particles are not fictious. We are developing a model which can help us understand this whole universe. We can't overlook anything and make our task easy and we want a model of everything. That's why we use 'everything'.