Thread: facts on CO2
View Single Post
Re: facts on CO2
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
bottomlander
2nd degree Black Belt
bottomlander will become famous soon enough
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 304
Thanks Given: 9
Thanked 58x in 51 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rep Power: 10
   
Re: facts on CO2 - 08-30-2007, 02:37 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJA View Post
Is it possible to create photosynthesis without knowing how a plant does it. I was taught that plants photosynthesis but as yet we don't know how. Has that changed?

=
MJA
Dear MJA,

You posted another question to challenge and belittle Science!
Why you repeated so many times with your style "Is it possible to ....... without knowing how ..... ?"
I humbly suggest one answer to your challenge: Nature is possible to function well without knowing Theory-of-everything.
Nature do things automatically, without following your "everything is equal" and "measure", your so-called Truths/TOE.

You said that "I was taught that plants photosynthesis but as yet we don't know how." How you, MJA, represent we or humans or science community and made the conclusion "as yet don't know how" ?
It is normal for your teachers hadn't provided you sufficient and updated details on
plant photosynthesis. If you really get the interest to know more about a topic, you have to do advanced self-study, consult with academic journals. Don't just conclude with your out-dated ignorant knowledge.
People will become subjective if they limit themselves just by looking for routine works to support themselves.

Don't just put endless questions to challenge
plant photosynthesis or science. Such a double standard is just for you to win, not of good morality. Why don't you question or re-think about your basis of reasoning?

As for your another challenge "
Has that changed?"
Many researchers know that the frontier and knowledge of science is pushing forward faster and faster. While MJA you just repeating the wisdoms of Heraclitus 2,500 years ago:
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." His works have the steps, details and reasoning, but your writings are just jump to conclusions with too little steps, details and reasoning.
Science changed/improved but you seems fixed on your initial ideas (perhaps only improved in your technique on challenges and debates with magic empty words).

Best Regards. Bottomlander
  
Reply With Quote