| Re: Can There be a Theory of Everything? -
09-01-2007, 03:37 PM
Then I guess I'll remain to proclaim that the one is equated with the none, as outlined by Michael.
It requires an observer and that which is observed. If all "selves" are one, and the unification of all selves results in one Self, in what fashion would that Self be aware of its Self without observation that would divide it?
The Eastern concept of one has been pondered for millennia, and is now being relatively considered by modern Western theoretical science. String Theory has been called a plausible candidate, and has lasted this long imo due to Einstein's theoretical work that was later confirmed.
Yet there is a big difference to what Einstein's work has lead to, and what String Theory would lead to. Could String Theory or one like it ever be empirically confirmed?
I had given you a direct compliment, but it had nothing to do with empiricism. Only to say that regardless of the frustrations you've been through in your work over the years, what matters it that you realize you have done it. |