| Re: Can There be a Theory of Everything?
'Stillness'?
Hmmmm...
Do you mean that which is abjectly bereft of motion, Nobody?
Isn't that among the unfindable conditions in the known universe?
I thought we contemplated it only by its conspicuous absence from observed space of any description...
Can't fathom any place where there ain't no space...
Can you?
If so, please let us know...
Best regards,
- RP
(Black holes are not retreating from the Schwartzchild radii, they're just charging in the other direction? Microcosmic infinity is as endless as macrocosmic...? Then there's the logarithm within the Golden Rectangle, which has only begun to be understood. I find Planck's constant in there, as an example that there are many more questions and answers, nearly all of which are so obvious they're being overlooked, and/or prematurely rejected.)
__________________
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
|