[N0B0DY]

I mean just that, RP, and no I can't fathom it. Yet I can't fathom space being everywhere either, only the space that is disparately observed as a result of relativity, that would be by definition opposite an absolute perspective. So I don't wish to jump to conclusions by forcing the universe to abide by limited human perspective, but to continue to contemplate the reason for its absence, which would lead to the cause of expansion.

Lloyd has been the only one who tried to reason with a change in direction from microcosmic infinity to macrocosmic infinity, and I disagreed that there is a point of return based on wave interference - the waves keep on going in.

I think rather wave interference in the opposing directions you mentioned completely cancel because the amplitudes from both directions would "eventually" perfectly match. Althhough when we invoke eternity there is no such thing as eventually because it must be logically based on a finite period of time - re: Zeno's Paradox vs Planck Length. So instead of saying eventually, I suggest that the event horizon carries throughout all "eternity," which renders the above perfect match instantaneous, and the universe absolutely still.

I'm sure it's as clear as mud, but it's very difficult to explain. It's the best I can do.