[N0B0DY]

Stillness in motion seems relevant to me, Michael. It is a thought-provoking poem.

I guess our arguments are a few-fold, and it is logical to think in terms of there not being any place without motion, as RP has said. It is sort of like fractal shapes applied to motion, where no matter how far down or up the scale we go there is by law always motion.

I think it was Lloyd a while back who made a good point, imo, that there can't be motion without stillness. I disagreed to see how far his thinking would go, and it was suggested that if there were two opposing directions of motion or even different speeds, that there would be a sense of motion.

If you drive your car there is a sense of motion relative to other objects, but if all objects moved at the same speed it is said that there would be no sense of motion. An absolute frame, that I think the absolute universe would have to have, would "move" along with any and all forms of relativistic motion, while remaining completely still because it is already at all places at all times, and I was sure that this reference would be relevant to RP's theory.

I would analogize it to a type of zero-point seat of stillness, which would be the absolute center point of both mind and body, that extends as observable linear and angular motion via the limited rate at which probablistic information can be processed consciously. Perhaps that which can be correlated with "c" velocity.

Good luck with the move, Michael.