Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  Relatively absolute doesn't make a damn bit of sense to me, Micheal. It's like saying upwardly centered.
I can get my head around the relative comparison to love, but think of love as being sensorily-interpreted, or thought-based, not that love actually exists. Then, if you are implying that the aether is not really required for observational reality...that it essentially doesn't exist, I guess I would comply as it stands.
I think Einstein had suggested as well that the medium of aether cannot be thought of as we do physical mediums, but one where motion loses its meaning. Perhaps RP might be able to shed some light on this reference. |
You are quite correct there Nobody,I admit getting a little over the top here,exaggerating
the issue,I just wanted to make the point,rather badly it seems,that the aether totally infills the entire physical universe.
regards michael.