Hey rascalpuff, I have read the URL and found it interesting. You did say
'Newton, established for the first time, that it - the universal realms of the large and small - is all connected by a singular, commonly acting, unidentified invisible force. That is the gist of Newton's proven discovery - the proven extrapolation of the same force that causes relatively miniscule apples to fall, also causing the orbiting of the relatively enormous planets'
While this looks on the surface to be gravity, it could in fact be magnetism as it says 'unidentified invisible force'. Magnetism is invisible. Does it then make sense that as we have an iron core in the middle of the world, that it is exerting an attractive force, i.e. pulling the apple towards its centre? As you know, even small magnets (such as Neodymium-Iron-Boron) can exert a huge force. If huge objects such as planets exerted an extremely strong magnetic force (both attraction and repulsion because of its bipolarity), wouldn't they all be attracted and repulsed by each other? Could it be possible that the way that each planet or star is in orbit is in a somewhat elegant nature where they are all in such a perfect balance with one another? Strong magnets can also heat objects by compressing their atoms together (so I believe) so this could explain how stars are held together. If a star is basically compressed gas, then if there was another star circulating it and pulling on it (by gravity), then wouldn't it be 'torn apart' and no longer be a star?! Also, if you look at the elliptical orbit of a comet (
http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~bds2/lt...TORB/COMET.HTM), can you see the similarity between that and magnetism? It is drawn in fast towards the planet and when it gets very close, it flips around and repels it, pushing it back away and starting the cycle again. Even with small magnets this flipping action is seen.