[N0B0DY]

Some might consider 0 to be the lowest whole number, Scott, perhaps rendering 1:0 as a ratio.

As for 1/0, there was a chart that you has posted a while back, POK, depicting 1 and 0 at the top and bottom of the y axis, and -1 and +1 at the right and left of the x axis.

If the chart instead depicted -1 and +1 at the bottom and top of the y axis, then there would be the 0 in the center of the chart, with both axes representative of 0 relative to each other.

It's true that 1/0 can be defined as representing an undivided whole, but it is misleading because the whole is "one" whole non-existent state - with the denominator representing the number of parts remaining. Wheras 1/1 is used for the representation of "one" whole existent state - with a denominator of 1.

The same applies to the north-south polarity, and the TOE, that can be reduced infinitely and always remain dualistic - positive and negative poles and forces. Absolute unification is the squishing of both poles into none, not one, because if there is one there it will always have two separate poles. Even the neutron, Scott, is allegedly made up of polar quarks, and the neutron itself is said to have a magnetic moment implying it is a dipole as well.