D+ Geometry (Part 3)
Fudge Factors
of
Denial
Denial of
spiritual substance and the
levity dynamic has always been a stumbling block to scientific understanding of natural phenomena. It has always been necessary to introduce a "
fudge factor" into the
models to make them match (
at least almost) the flux of nature as observed in the laboratory realities. The science institution uses such paradoxical terms as
repulsive gravity,
antigravity,
dark matter,
and dark energyin order to balance the mathematics.
The following quotation was "excerpted" from early pages of "
A Brief History Of Time" written by Stephen Hawking, physics professor at Cambridge University. (
underlines added)
(Excerpt Quotation )
"Even those who realized that Newton's theory of gravity showed that the universe could not be static did not think to suggest that it might be expanding. Instead, they attempted to modify the theory by making the gravitational force repulsive at very large distances.
Even Einstein, when he formulated the general theory of relativity in 1915, was so sure that the universe had to be static that he modified his theory to make this possible, introducing a so-called cosmological constant into his equations.
Einstein introduced a new "antigravity" force, which, unlike other forces, did not come from any particular source, but was built into the very fabric of space-time. He claimed that space-time had an inbuilt tendency to expand, and this could be made to balance exactly the attraction of all the matter in the universe, so that a static universe would result.
We can determine the present rate of expansion by measuring the velocities at which other galaxies are moving away from us, using the Doppler effect. This can be done very accurately. However, the distances to the galaxies are not very well known because we can only measure them indirectly. So all we know is that the universe is expanding by between 5 percent and 10 percent every thousand million years. However, our uncertainty about the present average density of the universe is even greater. If we add up the masses of all the stars that we can see in our galaxy and other galaxies, the total is less than one hundredth of the amount required to halt the expansion of the universe, even for the lowest estimate of the rate of expansion. Our galaxy and other galaxies, however, must contain a large amount of "dark matter" that we cannot see directly, but which we know must be there because of the influence of its gravitational attraction on the orbits of stars we can see in our galaxies. Moreover, most galaxies are found in clusters, and we can similarly infer the presence of yet more dark matter in between the galaxies in these clusters by its effect on the motion of the galaxies. When we add up all the dark matter; we still get only about one tenth of the amount to halt the expansion. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that there might be some other form of matter, distributed almost uniformly throughout the universe, that we have not detected and that might still raise the average density of the universe up to the critical value needed to halt the expansion." (End of Quote)
Newton and Einstein (
bless their genius souls) not withstanding, the same
missing link is still missing in the current (
and apparently competing)
cosmic models of the universal nature and from the
bizarre extrapolations of the scholarly science seekers as well.
SCIENCE
Common (at least published) beliefs of the elite college of quantum physics scientists describe their data with a multitude of
jargon words. It’s like poetic license for scholars. They invent terms like
quark, WIMPs, and MACHOs. These are totally new words with unique scientific meaning.
BABEL geometry does not deal with parochial
jargon words that are "uniquely scientific terms" such as these.
However, there are other "
jargon words" that are not unique to the scientific institution.
Dark matter,
dark energy, and
negative gravity are three such terms.
BABEL geometry exercises seek to examine such
arbitrary and
esoteric (
possibly even misleading to common folk) use of common language words like these in
fantasy contexts like the
Big Bang creation and an
expanding universe worldview.
The
Babelingo language of
D+ Geometry art jargon does not support the use of misleading words (
phrases) like those described above as an expression of legitimate scientific truth… but rather as erudite speculation. I respect the laboratory work, the collected data, the theoretical pondering, and the phenomenal mathematics of the science practitioners… but I disagree with the conclusions described as
dark matter,
dark energy, and
negative gravity.
We can "see"
matter… by its vary nature. It is manipulated in nature by an
energy force we term
gravity.
Gravity energy causes
material objects (
matter) to be drawn toward a more
massive center (
matter pole). All well and good. So…
Let’s do a flash-back to
Bible times. The
Genesis model for the creation of the world is expressed like this. "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." The
earth is composed of
material substance and
gravitational energy. The
heaven, on the other hand, is composed of
spiritual substance (
in opposition to material) and
levitational energy (
opposite of gravitational energy).
There’s a lot more to discuss here but first let us just consider the next "move" in the Biblical
creation sequence. Right after the "beginning"… the "spirit of God" moved… levitating the
spiritual substance of the creation… as the
gravitational energy of the
material nature moved in opposition… the world began to
SPIN (
the Spiritual Power In Nature) and does to this day. If you don’t believe it just watch the sun go by… or carefully watch your private daily flush.
I believe
dark matter is better defined as
spiritual substance… and
dark energy is better described as
spiritual energy… and
negative gravity should be re-designated as
positive levity. If these changes were made in the "elite science lexicon" and applied in the copious prognostication mathematics… I think the numbers would work out better and the people of common language could better understand the nature of nature and ponder the more proper words and perhaps better understand the true "
Geometry of God"