[N0B0DY]

I only follow the implications of science, religion and philosophy, and extend them to see how well the logic sits for me. Most models and interpretations have missing pieces or pieces that have been force fitted to suit preconceived pictures people have.

I like your thoughts on the creation of present moments, John, but all moments must be dilated in order for time and space to be created. You made reference to the poles, but didn't mention the non-existent cause for poles - the dividing line required for even a single dimension to be possible. Like I tried to express previously, there can be no concept of dimensions without a non-existent differentiator, and this thread attempts to posit the differentiator as the illusory basis for everything perceived. To proclaim that what exists to individuals, cannot exist from the absolute perspective - there are no poles or to and fro.

This can bring us to the I AM that you mentioned, which I suggest is synonymous to the shared subconsciousness resulting from the illusory break in universal symmetry or the non-existent absolute state that cannot be literally broken. Everything conceivable has an opposite except non existence because it is the result of all conceivable opposites - 1-1=0 - and the zero-point distance can only be broken or stretched through dilation because relative velocities increase distance exponentially to render pif's unimaginable infinity and eternity.

Ultimately there is the "Eternal Return" which is, yes, innate madness - have a look around - that can only be transcended by eradicating the self at the deepest subconscious level. Otherwise we exist according to the dictates of the subconscious mind, which holds guilt, punishment, rewards, etc.. The infinite subconsciousness doesn't have the absolute knowledge required to properly order the fluctuating chaos within, and like the poles each individual carries with them this madness until it is surrendered. Though it takes a while seeing how the conscious mind clings to things so strongly.