| Re: Steady State need not mean 'static' universe. Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY I don't think Lloyd realizes who you are, RP. Perhaps getting the two of us confused or something to that effect.
At any rate, wouldn't acceleration increase the matter density, proportionate to its rate? I think I had asked this before, but don't recall if mass is continuously packed on to keep things proportionate. Otherwise I think there would be some major gaps in the earth - like astronomical - observable even to the naked eye. | Hey there Nobody:
It's the same quantity of omnidirectionally accelerating energy distributed over an increasing quantity of space: squared.
Density remains the same in present time ('Eternal now'), varying only when compared with itself at earlier or later times - relatively more dense in the past, and relatively less dense in the future, ad infinitum.
There is no conflict with the law of conservation of mass energy.
Good to hear from you,
- RP
__________________ (George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words. "All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid |