Hi Pat:
How I came about my theory is a bit strange. My original theory has been around for over 20 years that can be verified as I had it registered by the Library of Congress in 1987. It actually began in 1970 in a way that I will disclose at a later time. In 1987 I was finally quite sure that what I was doing was right. The reason for this is I had time to examine the possibilities of the implications of my findings. There was much too many coincidences that were manifesting before my eyes. At times it was like watching a house of cards build itself before your eyes. I registered the document and discussed it with people. It scared the hell out of some people. My family does not want to talk about it. Some of the types that were involved in physical principals, were mostly non committal because of the lack of symmetry in the predicate and there was no other way to depict the idea of Continue. I published it indicating that I expected an 11 dimension multiverse. Everyone thought this to be quite a joke in 1987. I was working as assistant to the test director for a major aerospace project. We were doing the 21 bit flight encoders for the x-y positioners in the Star Wars program. I did the final trim on all 8 flight units. We lost 2 of these and one of the large format cameras in the shuttle crash. Leaving only 6 in existence. So any way I could not get too involved in my theory without putting my position in question. The security on this job was max. I let it go until later.
You can read a copy of the original document at
http://unit-unity-community.com/UUC.txt
In around 2000 I read the book “The Elegant Universe” by Brian Green. I also saw the show on PBS.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/
I was living just south of Boston at the time so I had access to many of the book stores were I always went to get my info. The MIT coop at the student center. I got what ever I could on the subject. I honestly am not up to that level with the math. But it was not necessary as all I needed to do is to watch the work that was being done and wait until someone generated the right picture. There is many that now have the picture of a multiverse that compares to the predicate that I created more than 20 years ago. You will know who’s site this is connected to. This about M-Theory.
http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gr/public/qg_ss.html
I have a copy of one that is close that was done about 4 years ago. It is a open source theory document. I will post it for you to look at. I would not be surprised is this person that did this might even come to toe-quest to communicate with us. It is quite likely he has many updated versions.
This is an older theory. It likely it will not display correctly but if you look through the document you should be able to find a web address that may have updated versions.
http://unit-unity-community.com/cdstuf/equations.txt
My work will continue in the way that it started simply waiting for the correct fit. The part of this that concerns me is the fix to what I am showing. The manner in which I depict the interface in the final predicate is almost infinitely flexible. So apparently that is not the part I should worry about until the final, When all comes together. The better that I do on the work I am doing now will result with a grand leap of knowledge that I have been preparing for about 37 years now.
I have experimented and found at least a dozen different way to depict the interface in the predicate and still the computer will accept it as long as I can describe the domains. The domains are a form of predicate calculus that allows me to describe this predicate to my Prolog software system. It is an AI software system.
I started writing in Prolog originally to see if I could use it to improve on my theory. As you can see I have been on quite a ride with this. I also learned to use it for this:
Read the training history. This is the real thing. It will be there when we are ready for it.
http://roseandclem.com/
John