[quote=minaras;33923]When somebody is studying the phenomenon of viruses ,he can see that when viruses are not coming in contact with a host organism, they are a sum of chemical compounds that not fulfill the criteria to be considered as life.
************************************************** ****
YES BUT: the virus is just in an "inert" state - all the potentiality to metabolise and reproduce exists in the inert state - it just needs to find a host in which to re-activate this potentiality. They don't literally become alive - they become ACTIVATED
************************************************** ****
The same thing happen with prions ,which are proteinaceous compounds that while they react with proteins of the host, they become alive in a way.
************************************************** ********
YES BUT: Prions are mutations causing the wrong instructions in normal proteins - they are alive and doing what they are equipted to do. I don't get the point "they become alive in a way"
************************************************** *******
Let's hypothesize that we make the hypothesis that:No living organism is possible to remain unchanged structurally.Lets hypothesize that this rule is principal in nature and nothing could go beyond it or prove that it is untrue.
************************************************** ********
YES BUT: This is allready established - you need to clarify your NEW idea. Atomic/sub-atomic theories? Quantium? I see what you are implying but you have not justified it with your premises.
I'd like to comment on the rest of you hypothesis but need clarification of above points first.
