View Single Post
Re: TotalFieldTheory: 4-D gravity includes time & motion.
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
RascalPuff
Aka the White Mongol
RascalPuff has a spectacular aura about
 
RascalPuff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,449
Thanks Given: 87
Thanked 80x in 76 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep Power: 20
   
Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: TotalFieldTheory: 4-D gravity includes time & motion. - 10-01-2007, 06:54 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie View Post
Hey Rascal, how does this work...? 'Is gravity really the 4th dimension? Or has the author only cleverly built his theory around reality so that no one can tell the difference? ' If the earth expands, as your theory claims, to create gravity, what's left to create the claimed gravity, when earth and "I" both reach inertial equilibrium? IMO, the waves have to push in, more than out, and I see no explanation of this in all your posts, or other material... Where is it...? "no one can tell the difference"___I can...

Lloyd
The operative words in your missive are 'In my opinion' - (you can tell the difference).

How can the difference be told, Lloyd?

"When the earth and I both reach inertial equlibrium", isn't going to happen, Lloyd, the earth is 25,000 miles circumference and is moving through a lot more space in given units of time, than you are, squared.


Best regards,
- RP

Post Script: It appears you are remiss in continuing our previous and recent *dialogues, Lloyd.
You've prematurely changed the inconsummate subject; apparently to re-engage and perpetuate an aggressive posture and 'keep me on the defensive.' *Including the one that finds you implying that I am 'dishonest', and then goes on to revise that implication to a category of 'mistake'... (We all make them).

A mistake need not at all be a dishonesty Lloyd.
Of course you know that.

Your syntax often proves characteristic wayward carelessness and (apparently deiberate) harsh insensitivity - not just as it is projected on me, but as a matter of historically recorded style, as you present yourself to others. At your best you prove to be a mature and guiding mentor and student; whereas, at your worst you seem to be nothing short of tyrannical (in either role).

Condescension, reprimand and derision usually do not compliment disagreement and/or correction, Lloyd. I know first hand from reading your works, that you can easily be above that. You're among the the most scientifically adept and would better serve yourself and others, without the disposable, subjective undercurrents. All of this post script is IMHO of course.

Best regards,
- RP


(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
  
Reply With Quote