Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie  Sorry, RP, but still no representational explanation of gravity. Just re-statements of known facts, and inertial equilibrium can never equal gravity___Any expanding masses, at 32fps must inertially equilibriate, without the countering wave forces. It must be thoroughly explained by the differences of opposite and same handednesses of the hydrodynamics of true matter/wave interactions. This will be the new field fronteer, we all must now enter... Brought to you by physicist, Jerry Merrill of Calais, Me....
Lloyd |
"...inertial equilibrium can never equal gravity___Any expanding masses, at 32fps must inertially equilibriate..."
You declare the same false premise - in another post - in flatly stating that your omnidirectionally generated inertia is going to get around to equalling that of the expanding earth... Not so.
*The difference is in accordance with Classical as well as Contemporary inertial and gravitational physics. The obligation to explain otherwise remains at your station.
The individual constituents of the earth will remain the same size and density as yours, but the collective system of 25,000 miles circumference moves outwardly at 32 foot seconds per second, while the collective system of yourself doesn't move anywhere near through as much space in a given unit of time, neither -
*by definition - will it ever.
I'm confident that if and when physicist Jerry Merrill ever agrees with you, he'll be just as equivocated.
*"...must inertially equilibriate...".
*By what standards of
'same handedness and hydrodynamics of true matter/wave interactions' must this implied 'inevitability' occur?
Best regards,
- RP