[Profpat]

Hi Cosvis;

I think our theories here are somewhat similar.

Yes I think our entire universe, came from a black hole, ( point, bindu dot, beginning point, center point ), and we are still attached to that black hole ( Gravity ).

Georg Cantor wrote about how an infinity of curves, is within every point.

Now I think reality reflects that concept.

Big bang theorist speculate that our entire original ( prebigbang )universe was more then a billion times smaller then the proton. Thats what I call spatial expansion.

Here is where we may part company. Again I believe in a symmetrical universe, and not the more common belief in an asymmetricl model.

At the beginning, when our universe was a point, it expanded into what we have today. Within that universal point was an infinity of curves, ( strings, radiation, heavens, )

With these strings, radiation, particles were formed. ( See my Idea for detail particle formation )
Both particles and antiparticles, ( You are right Cosvis gravity is the same for both, only the charge is different ).

I believe the particles went in one direction and the antiparticles in the opposite direction. (Many to some being annihilated in this process) Thus creating an antimatter parallel universe. In fact RP and I were speculating that a representation of this idea would be in the symbol of the Tao. Each one going eternally around the other.

But as with God only One universal point ( black hole ).

The problem as I see it with your theory, is that there there is no evidence for this antimatter in our observable universe Cosvis. That of course doesn't mean it can't be in the unobservable universe.

Well just some of my thoughts.

Best to you,

Pat