View Single Post
Re: On The Development of a Theory of The Universe
Old
  (#45 (permalink))
everymansmedium
2nd degree Black Belt
everymansmedium will become famous soon enough
 
everymansmedium's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 301
Thanks Given: 56
Thanked 48x in 37 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2007
Rep Power: 7
   
Re: On The Development of a Theory of The Universe - 10-02-2007, 01:14 PM

Lloyd #5:
Hello Lloyd, what you ask for is called the "keys to the beast." I can give you the Keys to the beast.
In a medium that can mutate with time:
Our body is such a medium. Essentially a regenerative chemical computer. If you reject the idea of divine intervention then it is a “spontaneous regenerative chemical computer” a species is “specific data”. Character is data.
Our body is not the only time mutable medium. A computer is also a time mutable medium.
The keys to the beast:
The probability priority loop. This is a continuous loop that calculates various probabilities and uses this information to set a priority of actions. Explained in terms of faith and fear.
Faith = calculation of probability positive.
Fear = calculation of probability negative.
Situation = object of interest is in the direct path of program that is running at present. = (Sit +)
Situation = object of interest is not in the direct path of the program that is operating at present. = (Sit - )
The calculation of faith is also a cumulative feed back system where the past results effect the present setting of the priority of actions.
IF:
Faith and Sit + = no action is needed. No need to attain what you already have.
Faith and Sit - = an action of attainment will occur if sufficient cumulative Faith.
Fear and Sit + = an action of avoidance.
Fear and Sit - = no action is needed. No need to avoid what is not in your path.

Please understand that this is a very simple explanation. But by its implications it can demonstrate the possibility of inanimate matter to become perpetually animate. This very same was sent to indicate inherent problems with the Space Mixing Theory. I was told,” I did not think of that.”, However that concept remains in the public eye as it was and my ideas still remain somewhat obscure, however less so.
I still generate not but silence.
John
  
Reply With Quote