Rascal, "time" means only its fundamental one thing___"Matter in motion." This is the mistake most thinkers make. Time is our psychological concept of celestial motions, and nothing more. You can't make theories, or Zeno, work on "time", and phony distance paradoxes. Put the real "matter in motion" in all equations, and "presto"___They make sense. In other words, put the matter/wave filled space in Zeno's distance paradox, and it only reduces to the most fundamental matter/waves. They just happen to be 3D, or they couldn't exist, except on paper, and in our exaggerated abstract imaginations___That ain't real___It's representations of ideas, and abstracts...
Quote:
|
It's two different expressions of the same phenomenon.
|
This is true enough, but matter expresses physical reality, and time can be exaggerated into meta-nonsense...
Quote:
| Zeno excuded time, and behold his (perhaps deliberately created) fictional quandary of never arriving from his point of departure |
No, Zeno didn't exclude time, he just didn't include matter/waves...
Quote:
|
Time is the continuum that separates events in space
|
True enough, but better seen as matter/waves in motion. I just see far too much of a problem of invoking the
continuum... It's too metaphysical. "Matter/waves in motion" better serves the "pie" that possibly can unite quantum and relative physics...
Quote:
|
There is an interval of space dividing two events, that interval of event division is the dimension of time - in the case of three omnidirectionally expanding dimensions of space, contrary to what you declare: time is space: squared; at concentric right angles from itself, arriving endlessly in a 'now', having endlessly departed from - or approaching - a 'then'.
|
"Dimension of time" is far more seriously understood, as its fundamental motion and distances of real matter travel. And space is "matter in motion over distances." Don't you see, your differences of linguistics, are really no difference, at all. It just makes the conversations easier, when absolute fundamentals are used, instead of thinking the re-naming linguistics of one discipline are the only one, when the inter-disciplinary linguistics, have the ability to unite quantum and relative theories. I think it quite possible, if we threw out all the linguistic quagmires of both quantum and relative physics, we may really be able to completely unite them...
Regards,
Lloyd