Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing  Sorry RascalPuff, but even those of us who understand the wave phenomena do not abandon the aspects of standing wave particles. There is a great deal of evidence that particles DO exist; Where is the data and experimentation that supports your view that they DO NOT????? Could this just be another RP opinion or are you quoting some other website you've been reading? |
'Standing wave particle' - non sequitur.
(Refer LCDM - Lambda Cold Dark Matter - another desperate 'adjustment' by Standard Theorists. Another tin of worms.)
The point is, that the giddy apparition of 'particle' hasn't been abandoned.
What evidence do you allude to - in what objective fortification are you sequestered, while subjectively projecting your wordy, ham, eggs 'n oatmeal - in saying that particles do exist?
The documentary (non website acquired) data and experimentation that particles don't exist, is recorded on my forum.
You know, that URL location axe that's regularly grounded on this website.
Where is the data and experimentation that supports your view that they do?
Could this be just another dleviwing gaffe, obliquely inquiring when Truly Yours may quit beating his grandmother?
(Truly Yours predicted that the expanding universe is
accelerating, in a a series of published, distributed, sold out documents <in three languages> in 1959: sans websites. <I wasn't on line until '02>)
The improved inquiry is, what website, or other punchy influence, are you tilting under - this time?
Authenticate and ground your allegations and argument.
You needn't be sorry, Dave.
Never mind the cynical facade.
Substantiate your hackneyed, ad hoc vignette.
Be specific.
Be scientific.
Best regards,
- RP