[MJA]

Dear RP,

If you wouldn't mind a writing critique only for the purpose of understanding or for clarity of your most knowledgeable views, I would suggest you start or end with a simple premise or sentence explaining your purpose. After reading your thread starter I can not determine if you personally believe that an inert state exists, or that all energy and mass are in motion.
Perhaps it is only my novicity of physics that creates this lack of understanding, but I also believe much of what we think we know about nature is absolutely incorrect, and for me worthless.

Perhaps for clarity sake, in your personal view, you could answer these simple questions:

Is matter or energy ever inert, or motionless?

If not, how do you measure the "(inert mass value) weight", or the motionless weight of energy or mass, Riemann's metric tensor?

Cannot gravity be defined as simply the motion of attraction, or the natural motion of equilibrium?

Do you believe gravity is measurable with absolute certainty?

Can gravity be measured as an inert energy value?

Lastly, do you think the aether experiment of Michelson and Morley had any validity or truth?

Thanks for your help,

=
MJA

PS: Is a mathematical physics equation an unnatural inert state(ment) of the natural state(ment) of motion?
Or more simply: Can a motionless equation define nature?
Feel free Lloyd or anyone to wade in on these questions.