| Re: The Three Theory
Purveyor,
It is good to have you back at the site. I have to warn you, though, after this little breakthrough I had on the 1/0 and 0/1-thing, I am no longer going to take any number at face value anymore. The most important aspect is the context, because it is the context that declares the actual value of a number or word.
As you can read, I acknowledge the binary system, the decimal system, and the general approach to the number 1. I do no longer use 1 meaning the whole in the same context as 0 meaning no value anymore, because they do not belong to the same level.
I guess I have to repeat my question to you: in what context do your numbers take place? If undeclared, I must consider them as just abstracts, and then they actually don't capture any real value anymore. Then they become like modern paintings that mean one thing to one person and another thing to another person. Just because we can paint, does not mean a meaning was captured in the painting.
I hope I am not upsetting you with this information. I am glad you are back.
P.S. Scott has not replied to this thread, so is it still all about three?
__________________
The difference between a structure based on unification and a structure without unification hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if nothing is mighty fundamental. Read In Search of a Cyclops with titillating mathematical evidence (see homepage) to find out if separation belongs to the fundamental basics of our universe - or not. |