Thread: the motion paradox
View Single Post
Re: the motion paradox
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
AntonioLao
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,308
Thanks Given: 724
Thanked 123x in 121 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
Re: the motion paradox - 10-12-2007, 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing
more of an axiom
David Hilbert thought the same way that's why his school to axiomatize mathematics failed see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hilbert

Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(t)·r(t)=c²
  
Reply With Quote