No I wasn't being wilfully ignorant. I have not really followed the 'Theory of Nothing'. There were so many posters, so many posts, and so many ideas in there that I sorta gave up on that one, sorry.
You said that you gave two examples of paradoxes. I read back to find them. Are these correct?
Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  One of the most common, imo, is based on the commonly-accepted inflationary model which posits expansion of space into non existence;
Another, based on an alternative model of a priori infinite space, is that space in all its fullness would have the capacity to move anywhere when it already is allegedly everywhere. |
Now that I have read them I understand what your saying.
If we replace the word expansion, with the word creation would you agree that the paradox is resolved? In other words space is being created wherever gravity cannot overcome it. As space already exists so it must have been created 'inside' non-existence or it has always been here.
As regards the second one, I am not sure what you mean by space moving?
The way I see it there is no paradox, altho I am not sure if anyone else sees it like me. But to me space is a variable measurement only. The motion of matter is the 'cause' , or first principle, space is one of the measurable by-products. Not a very good description, I know, but I find these ideas difficult to place in text
No offence Nobody ... cool bananas ... greg
